<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Quantum Problems | Miguel Navascués | Activity</title>
	<link>https://oqp.iqoqi.oeaw.ac.at/members/navascues/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://oqp.iqoqi.oeaw.ac.at/members/navascues/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Miguel Navascués.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:26:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=11.0.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2489961335484ea0a00fda94b8e7ad14</guid>
				<title>Miguel Navascués changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://oqp.iqoqi.oeaw.ac.at/activity/p/14/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:13:23 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">196410d3119c463ecdd06e0b73085abf</guid>
				<title>Miguel Navascués replied to the topic Bell&#039;s Inequality Paradoxon Higgs Boson in the forum Open Quantum Problems</title>
				<link>http://oqp.iqoqi.univie.ac.at/groups/oqp-public-forum/forum/topic/bells-inequality-paradoxon-higgs-boson/#post-74</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:05:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">edd572663bbb9894644fd33bef6c4eb5</guid>
				<title>Miguel Navascués replied to the topic Bell&#039;s Inequality Paradoxon Higgs Boson in the forum Open Quantum Problems</title>
				<link>http://oqp.iqoqi.univie.ac.at/groups/oqp-public-forum/forum/topic/bells-inequality-paradoxon-higgs-boson/#post-74</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:05:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6e7ccbf24ec9463701c9fb005af753ee</guid>
				<title>Miguel Navascués started the topic There are exactly 1972 prime numbers in the forum Open Quantum Problems</title>
				<link>http://oqp.iqoqi.univie.ac.at/groups/oqp-public-forum/forum/topic/there-are-exactly-1972-prime-numbers/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:04:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I just found a topological mistake in the proof of the infinity of prime numbers. Mathematicians have been carrying this mistake since Euclid&#8217;s times! Actually, if you regard each natural number as a point in a S^3 spherical surface and multiplication as the length of the geodesic connecting the points minus a correction due to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-13"><a href="http://oqp.iqoqi.univie.ac.at/groups/oqp-public-forum/forum/topic/there-are-exactly-1972-prime-numbers/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6e7ccbf24ec9463701c9fb005af753ee</guid>
				<title>Miguel Navascués started the topic There are exactly 1972 prime numbers in the forum Open Quantum Problems</title>
				<link>http://oqp.iqoqi.univie.ac.at/groups/oqp-public-forum/forum/topic/there-are-exactly-1972-prime-numbers/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:04:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I just found a topological mistake in the proof of the infinity of prime numbers. Mathematicians have been carrying this mistake since Euclid&#8217;s times! Actually, if you regard each natural number as a point in a S^3 spherical surface and multiplication as the length of the geodesic connecting the points minus a correction due to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-12"><a href="http://oqp.iqoqi.univie.ac.at/groups/oqp-public-forum/forum/topic/there-are-exactly-1972-prime-numbers/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e92a336a49e0bd28ea664edf52fb4372</guid>
				<title>Miguel Navascués started the topic There are exactly 1972 prime numbers in the forum Open Quantum Problems</title>
				<link>http://oqp.iqoqi.univie.ac.at/groups/oqp-public-forum/forum/topic/there-are-exactly-1972-prime-numbers/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:04:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I just found a topological mistake in the proof of the infinity of prime numbers. Mathematicians have been carrying this mistake since Euclid&#8217;s times! Actually, if you regard each natural number as a point in a S^3 spherical surface and multiplication as the length of the geodesic connecting the points minus a correction due to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9"><a href="http://oqp.iqoqi.univie.ac.at/groups/oqp-public-forum/forum/topic/there-are-exactly-1972-prime-numbers/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2905311434f615346a9102ffac86af85</guid>
				<title>Miguel Navascués joined the group OQP Public Forum</title>
				<link>https://oqp.iqoqi.oeaw.ac.at/activity/p/8/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:57:46 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">58202d153c47e0c3aa3c87973bf34e2c</guid>
				<title>Miguel Navascués became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://oqp.iqoqi.oeaw.ac.at/activity/p/6/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:57:09 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>